Proven Technology, Chosen for a Reason
Behind 1,500+ delivered projects is a deliberately boring principle: use technology that will still be maintainable in ten years, write the reasoning down, and hand everything over. Here is what we build with and why.
Six Layers, One Standard
Every layer is documented and handed over at delivery, so your team, or any future vendor, can pick it up.
Backend
- .NET Core
- Laravel (PHP)
- Node.js
- REST and GraphQL APIs
Chosen per project for maintainability and hiring depth, not fashion.
Web and mobile
- Next.js and React
- Flutter (iOS + Android)
- Swift and Kotlin for native needs
- Progressive Web Apps
One codebase where it saves money, native where hardware demands it.
Data
- PostgreSQL
- SQL Server
- MySQL
- Redis caching and reporting layers
Schemas documented and handed over; your data is never a black box.
Cloud and DevOps
- AWS and Azure
- Docker and CI/CD pipelines
- On-premise deployment
- Monitoring and backups
Sized to your load and budget, including fully on-premise for government work.
Integrations
- Payment gateways
- Accounting and ERP systems
- WhatsApp and email automation
- Logistics and mapping APIs
Documented APIs so data is entered once and used everywhere.
Security and quality
- Role-based access control
- Audit logging
- Automated and manual QA
- Code review on every merge
Security designed in from the schema up, not patched on later.
Stack Questions, Answered Straight
How we choose technology, whether we can work in yours, and where AI fits.
Core builds use .NET Core, Laravel or Node.js on the backend; Next.js and React on the web; Flutter for cross-platform mobile with Swift and Kotlin where native access is required; PostgreSQL, SQL Server or MySQL for data; and AWS, Azure or on-premise infrastructure for hosting. The stack for each project is recommended in writing with reasons, during the specification phase.
Yes. If your team already runs a stack, we build within it so your engineers can maintain the result. Where we inherit a legacy system, we start with an architecture review and modernize incrementally rather than forcing a rewrite.
Three questions decide it: what the system must do (real-time, offline, heavy reporting), who will maintain it after launch, and what hiring looks like in your market. The recommendation goes in the written specification with the reasoning, so you can defend the choice internally. We hold no reseller agreements, so the advice is not steered by commissions.
Yes, in two ways. We build AI-assisted features into client systems — document processing, chat assistants, forecasting and automation — where they solve a real workflow problem. Internally, our teams use modern tooling to speed up delivery, but every line that ships passes human code review and QA.
Tell us what you need. We scope it in one call.
Describe your project, and a senior engineer will send you a written scope and fixed price. No obligation.